|
This is the first
installment of a new online column, called
“Ask Bill Tytus.” Throughout the year, Bill
– who is president of Pocock Racing Shells
and one of the leading experts in the racing
shells industry – will use this column to
answer questions on various rowing topics.
One of the hot
topics in the rowing world today is the
debate over short vs. long hulls. Top rowers
and coaches around the country have been
asking Bill this surprisingly complicated
question: "Does the length of a racing shell
make a difference in speed?"
The short answer to
this question is no. In order to understand
why, however, you must first understand some
basic hydrodynamics.
Hydrodynamics is the
study of things moving through water. It is
not an intuitive science; it’s an empirical
science based on painstaking measurement.
The research and study
of hydrodynamics takes time and
instrumentation, which is extremely
expensive. The vast majority of what is
known today has been developed by the navies
of the world. In addition, America’s Cup
sailing syndicates have also spent many
millions of dollars on hydrodynamic
research. Even after spending all this money
there has been huge inconsistency in the
performance of the boats. This is an
indication of how much there is yet to learn
about boats moving through water.

Bill Tytus training in
Boston in the
1960s.
In addition to the
expense of hydrodynamic research, racing
shells have few dimensional similarities to
other boats. So, although we might know
something about aircraft carriers,
destroyers and submarines, this knowledge is
a not always applicable.
This doesn’t mean that
we can’t make meaningful hydrodynamic
inferences for racing shells. It just means
that we must be very careful with our
hydrodynamic assumptions.
In designing racing
shells, we must be primarily concerned with
the aspect of drag, which is what slows the
boat down. The two most significant kinds of
hydrodynamic drag are friction and wave
drag. Friction drag is the wet area of the
boat dragging against the molecules of the
water. Wave drag, of course, is the
resistance due to waves being made at the
interface of the air and water. For example,
submarines do not experience wave drag when
they are fully submerged.
It is widely believed
that 80-90 percent of racing shells’
hydrodynamic drag is simple skin friction
and that wave drag is the major part of the
remaining 10-20 percent. Certainly it makes
sense to first try to reduce friction drag
since it is such a large part of total drag.
At first glance, it would seem that a
shorter boat might have less surface area in
the water. And since friction drag is
related to surface area, we would hope that
the shorter boat would have less drag.
Friction drag, however,
is not just a function of surface area only.
It is actually a function of speed, surface
area and a frictional co-efficient. Clearly,
anything we can do to reduce surface area
will reduce drag. Unfortunately, reducing
the length of a boat also increases the
co-efficient of drag. What this means is
that if we shorten the boat, even though the
surface area is less, the drag per unit of
area is greater.
Even though wave drag
amounts to a smaller proportion of total
drag it must not be ignored. Wave drag is a
function of speed over length. It is easily
understood that when speed increases, the
size of the boat waves grow, which increases
drag. Perhaps not so obvious is that
decreasing the length of a boat also makes
the waves bigger. As crews push these boats
faster and faster the wave drag not only
increases, but becomes a bigger factor in
total drag. This indicates that all things
being equal, longer boats might be faster.
But, of course, all
things are not equal and none of these
factors by itself really tells the whole
story. For example, one of today’s popular
eights has a length of 55.23 ft. and a wet
area of 104.46 sq. ft. A Pocock V8 for the
same crew is longer (57.06 ft.), but due to
careful design work actually has a smaller
wet area (103.9 sq. ft.).
Over the years, boat
length has changed cyclically, just like
fashion. History has never proven that
shorter boats are more effective.
Bill Tytus has been
the president of Pocock Racing Shells since
1985. He designs all the companies’ boats
and has a storied rowing back-ground. In
1969, he placed second in the Diamond Sculls
event at the Henley Royal Regatta and was a
member of the U.S. National Team from
1969-71. He is still active in the sport,
teaming with Frank Cunningham for the past
13 years to coach elite scullers at Lake
Washington Rowing Club.
Click here for printer-friendly version (Adobe Acrobat Reader required)
|