Introduction
The stiffness of racing shells can
be measured and compared with a
few simple tests. The structural
stiffness of a racing shell is important;
if a boat’s structure deflects under
load (when the rower pulls), then
it is absorbing energy that would
otherwise be available to propel
it. A stiffer system transmits power
to hull speed more efficiently.
Stiffness testing quantifies a
boat’s structure and allows comparison
of one boat to another in meaningful
ways. Following extensive structural
engineering work, Pocock developed
the new Hypercarbon laminate, and
compared its stiffness to other
well regarded boats. All of the
boats were tested for longitudinal
and torsional hull stiffness. And
because hull stiffness alone does
not truly indicate how stiff the
boat feels to the rower, a third
test was added to measure deflection
at the oarlock under a simulated
rowing load.
Longitudinal stiffness (hull flexure
over its length) has long been the
classic quantifier for stiffness
because it is easy to measure. The
East Germans were doing longitudinal
stiffness tests back in the mid-1970s,
and coaches have been grabbing the
ends of boats and shaking them from
time immemorial. These are informal
longitudinal bending tests based
on the improbable assumption that
a boat stiff in one dimension is
stiff overall.
Torsional stiffness (hull twisting)
has not been measured in any way
that we are aware of outside of
Pocock Racing Shells. Pocock has
been doing formal longitudinal and
torsional bending tests since 1987,
firmly believing that stiffness
in both dimensions is more indicative
of overall stiffness.
But even these two tests together
are not the best indication of a
boat’s stiffness. Both tests assume
that the outriggers are infinitely
stiff, which of course, they are
not. The way the riggers attach
to the boat, or the way the riggers
are supported in the hull, definitely
affects the system’s stiffness.
Therefore, the truest and most meaningful
test of a boat’s overall stiffness
is the Rigger/System Flex Test,
measuring the deflection of the
loaded oarlock.
Goals
Our purpose in conducting these
tests is to discover differences
in stiffness between:
1) Pocock’s new Hypercarbon laminate
and old laminate.
2) Pocock’s new Hypercarbon boats
and other well regarded boats, specifically
Vespoli (Ultralight, Millennium
and M2), Empacher and Resolute.
Methodology
Longitudinal Bending Test:
The boat is fixed upside down on
two hard supports, one at the aft
end of the cockpit and one in the
middle; 10 kg and 20 kg weights
are hung at the forward end of the
cockpit. Deflection is measured
at the forward end of the cockpit.
Two weights are used in order to
check the linearity of the deflection
and to get enough total deflection
for easily discernable measurements.
In order to accommodate all the
various boats in this test series,
and to insure equal bending moments,
the aft and middle supports were
placed 18’ 0” apart,
and the weights were hung 16’
1” forward of the middle support.
Torsional Bending Test:
The boat is fixed at the stern
end of the cockpit and a torque
arm with a center pivot is attached
at the bow end of the cockpit; 10
kg and 20 kg weights are hung on
the arm, 30” from the center,
and deflection is measured there.
All the boats were tested with the
torque arm 34’ 1” forward
of the fixed aft support.
Rigger/System Flex Test:
With the boat upright in slings,
a 240 lb. pulling force is applied
via a block and tackle arrangement
between the top of the pin of the
#6 rigger and the bottom of the
pin of the #5 rigger, thus applying
a forward diagonal load (similar
to the force at the catch). Deflection
is measured between the pins, i.e.
parallel to this tensile force.
Results
The results are presented in the
following table.
LESS DEFLECTION INDICATES MORE
STIFFNESS
|